SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Sen. Bernie Sanders has introduced legislation that would require the Pentagon to return a portion of its budget as a penalty for failing audits, but lawmakers from both parties have declined to consider the bill.
The Pentagon announced late last week that it failed its seventh consecutive audit as the sprawling, profiteering-ridden department wasn't able to fully account for its trillions of dollars in assets.
As with its past failures to achieve a clean audit, the U.S. Defense Department attempted to cast the 2024 results in a positive light, with the Pentagon's chief financial officer declaring in a statement that "momentum is on our side."
The Pentagon is the largest U.S. federal agency and is responsible for roughly half of the government's annual discretionary spending, with its yearly budget approaching $1 trillion despite long-standing concerns about the department's inability to account for vast sums of money approved by lawmakers and presidents from both major parties.
The latest financial assessment published Friday by the Defense Department's inspector general office estimates that the Pentagon has $4.1 trillion in assets. It is the only major federal agency that has never passed a clean audit, as required by law.
"Of the 28 reporting entities undergoing stand-alone financial statement audits, nine received an unmodified audit opinion, one received a qualified opinion, 15 received disclaimers, and three opinions remain pending," the Pentagon
said Friday.
Since the department's first failed audit in 2018, Congress has authorized trillions of dollars in additional military spending. According to the Costs of War Project, more than half of the department's annual budget "is now spent on military contractors" that are notorious for overbilling the government.
"The Pentagon's latest failed audit is a great signal to the incoming administration for where they can start their attempts at slashing government spending," Lindsay Koshgarian, director of the National Priorities Project at the Institute for Policy Studies, told Common Dreams. "Instead of gutting veterans' benefits or the Department of Education as planned, they should start with the one major government agency that has never passed an audit, the Pentagon."
Progressive watchdogs and lawmakers have long cited the Pentagon's failure to pass a clean audit as evidence of the department's pervasive waste and fraud. The Pentagon buried a 2015 report identifying $125 billion in administrative waste out of concern that the findings would be used as a justification "to slash the defense budget," as The Washington Postreported at the time.
Last year, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) introduced an amendment to the annual National Defense Authorization Act that would have required the Pentagon to return a portion of its budget to the Treasury Department's general fund as a penalty for failing audits.
"Year after year the establishment on both sides of the aisle have prevented these amendments from receiving a single roll call vote," Warren Gunnels, Sanders' staff director, wrote on social media over the weekend.
This story has been updated to include comment from Lindsay Koshgarian of the National Priorities Project.
Update (1:20 pm EST)
The Democratic National Committee's (DNC) decision to suspend Sen. Bernie Sanders's presidential campaign's access to a crucial voter database after a software glitch is an "inappropriate overreaction" that shows "the leadership of the DNC is now actively attempting to undermine our campaign," a top staffer said in a press conference Friday afternoon.
Sanders' campaign manager, Jeff Weaver, said that by freezing the campaign's access to voter data, the national party apparatus is essentially "taking our campaign hostage."
He said it was "impossible to mobilize the kind of grassroots campaign we have without that data."
If the DNC does not restore access immediately, Weaver said the Sanders camp will take the party to federal court on Friday afternoon.
"They are not going to sabotage our campaign," Weaver said.
Earlier...
Critics are angry that the Democratic National Committee (DNC) suspended Sen. Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign's access to a crucial voter database just weeks before the first Democratic caucuses.
The penalty stems from a software error that allowed a Sanders staffer to access confidential voter information gathered by Hillary Clinton's rival campaign, according to the Washington Post, which first reported the incident late Thursday. The Sanders campaign said the staffer has since been fired.
The Post explained:
The DNC maintains the master list and rents it to national and state campaigns, which then add their own, proprietary information gathered by field workers and volunteers. Firewalls are supposed to prevent campaigns from viewing data gathered by their rivals.
NGP VAN, the vendor that handles the master file, said the incident occurred Wednesday while a patch was being applied to the software. The process briefly opened a window into proprietary information from other campaigns, said the company's chief, Stu Trevelyan. He said a full audit will be conducted.
The DNC has reportedly told the Sanders campaign that access to the data will not be allowed again until it provides an explanation for how the breach occurred and assures that all Clinton data has been destroyed.
The timing couldn't be worse. As the Guardiannoted, the move "functionally halts [the campaign's] field operation."
Already, a MoveOn.org petition calling on DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz to immediately reinstate the Sanders campaign's access to the 50-state voter file has gathered more than 85,000 signatures. With the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary less than two months away, the petition reads, "Shutting down Sanders' tools to reach voters is an infringement on democracy. "
It also reeks of favoritism, some charged, coming on the heels of a big day for the Sanders campaign, in which it announced two major endorsements and a historic fundraising milestone.
Sanders campaign manager Jeff Weaver told the Post that staffers "never downloaded or printed any of the data, meaning it is no longer in possession of any proprietary information. "
Weaver blamed NGP VAN and criticized the DNC for hiring the company, saying the Sanders campaign had flagged similar problems with the DNC's software in the past.
CNN spoke with the fired staffer--national data director Josh Uretsky--who said the breach was an attempt to "understand how badly the Sanders campaign's data was exposed" by the software error.
"We knew there was a security breach in the data, and we were just trying to understand it and what was happening," Uretsky told CNN.
The incident comes amid criticism that the number and timing of the Democratic primary debates—another of which is taking place this Saturday evening, six days before Christmas—are giving an advantage to establishment candidate Hillary Clinton.
As Frank Bruni wrote of the debate schedule in the New York Times on Friday: "It smacks of special treatment, and Clinton, who set up her own home-brewed email account as secretary of state, can't afford to keep giving voters the impression that normal rules don't apply to her."
The bottom line, columnist Greg Sargent said in an op-ed Friday, is that the DNC should restore Sanders' access to voter data as quickly as possible: "This is no way to maintain confidence in the integrity of the primary process."